Joel Stewart
- Total activity 778
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 4
- Subscriptions 347
Comments
Recent activity by Joel Stewart-
Official comment Hi Marten! Thanks for the question. This is the expected behavior for 13K records by default. There is a "Max Data" setting for each widget and if the total records in the workbook exceeds that val...
-
Official comment Datameer is installed on a server. Here are the documented System Requirements for that server. The Datameer server can connect with a Hadoop cluster for distributed storage and computing. Here ar...
-
Guhan - I'd be cautious about implementing a custom function that requires feedback from an outside system. This may cause a lot of lag when using the function since the result must be computed and...
-
Rahul, thank you for the question. Datameer does not have any specific case studies that are sharable, however I am confident that Datameer is an excellent choice for analyzing this type of analys...
-
I was able to successfully use your original formula and execute then re-open the workbook successfully. I'm using Datameer 5.11.14, what version did you test with? There may be some additional co...
-
Official comment Thanks for the question Andy! Both joins will be applied to the data set so yes, the inner join will limit results. Logically, the order of the joins does not matter -- the end result is the same i...
-
Could you please share the entire job log's contents? The error itself is not specific enough and it would be helpful to see a wider scope of context.
-
Official comment I can't think of a function that can be used to perform this directly, however it can be done in a couple of steps. In a sheet, create a keyed list of the values that you'd like to split later. He...
-
The row order is not expected to be maintained between different sheets. Hadoop may process the records on different distributed nodes and the order of the output records may differ from the input ...
-
The GROUPROWNUMBER function would be tying this solution too closely to the order of the rows. I advise taking a critical look at the expected outcome to verify if the row number itself is required...